Microsoft strategy according to Linus Torvalds

Linus Torvalds Was Right — A Summary

In 2001, Linus Torvalds warned that Microsoft’s hostility toward open source was structural and permanent — not a phase. The tech world called him paranoid. Microsoft called Linux “a cancer.” The battle lines were clear.

Then Satya Nadella arrived in 2014 and everything changed in tone. Microsoft began contributing to Linux, launched Windows Subsystem for Linux, open-sourced .NET, and in 2018 bought GitHub for $7.5 billion. Every tech journalist declared the wars over. Linus was wrong. Microsoft had changed.

Linus stayed skeptical. He never said Microsoft couldn’t change. He said they wouldn’t — and that the difference mattered.

He was right.

The evidence accumulated gradually and quietly. Windows 11 arrived with mandatory telemetry that couldn’t be disabled, forced Microsoft accounts, and an ecosystem increasingly difficult to escape. GitHub Copilot trained on billions of lines of open source code and sold the output as a proprietary subscription service. The Recall feature — which screenshotted everything users did and stored it unencrypted — was nearly shipped enabled by default. Microsoft’s $13 billion investment in OpenAI embedded proprietary AI into every Microsoft product, requiring user data to flow through Microsoft servers. Windows 365 moved the entire operating system to the cloud — users no longer own it, they rent it.

The pattern Linus identified decades ago — embrace, integrate, make essential, then control — executed exactly as he described. Microsoft never tried to destroy Linux. They made it irrelevant by controlling the layers above it — cloud, AI, productivity — so that the operating system underneath barely matters anymore.

By late 2024, developers who had spent years defending Microsoft’s transformation began saying quietly what Linus had said loudly in 2001.

The corporation didn’t change. It just got more patient.

Deixe um comentário